Sunday, August 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
THE SITE DEDICATED TO INFORMING HEALTH CARE DEBATE
medicine, specialists, physician, cancer, cardiovascular, cardiology, heart, digestive diseases, geriatrics, neuroscience, pediatrics, psychiatry, transplantation, vascular,healthcare health care debate republican democrat obama trends spending expenditure costs hospitals doctors nurses insurancetransparency, congress, government, earmarks, grants, investigative, citizens,, For those of you who are getting tired of squinting at the same old scripted cue cards while keyboarding your letters of outrage over health care reform, please feel free to plagiarize from this brief compendium of terms of engagement. We will start with some of the more contentious concepts.
The obvious reason for this drastic increase in health cost is that our health care system is broken. However, I say we look a little harder.
ReplyDeleteIn the '40s, the opportunity for health care was not available the way it is today. CAT scans did not exist. Multi-year treatment programs for diseases and cancers were not the norm. Average lifespans were shorter.
The most dramatic change on the graph is not health care, it is food. Why did food costs plummet? Why does the rise of health care costs seem to directly coincide with the fall of food costs?
After WWII our food supply began a several decades long process of industrialization. Food production soared which lead to lower prices. The negative is that our food supply has become nutrient deficient. Also, we consume much more food per person. The lower cost of food has lead to obesity (I bet that line looks just like the health care line).
Above the graph states "...costs continue to rise, millions... unable to afford care." But in 1950 it appears about 50% of disposable income was spent on these essentials (which makes it not disposable income in my book, I assume they actually mean total income). Currently, it seems slightly less is spent on essentials. Housing costs have dropped recently. I guess some people might have to cut Cable TV out of their budget.